price1367
TTC Group
The last part in this post is not correct.
At the roadside, If the police have grounds to believe that a driver has consumed alcohol in the past 20 minutes - not an hour - then they should wait for the 20 minutes to be up. Unless they have specific information that alcohol has been consumed in the past 20 minutes then they do not have to wait.
Now it might seem sensible to ask when the driver last had an alcoholic drink but case law says that this is not actually necessary.
The reading that you are prosecuted for is the one at the police station and I am certain that mouth alcohol will have long gone by the time you are booked in to custody and then placed on the evidential machine.
I have done tests on the Lion Intoxilyzer 6000 for mouth alcohol. Very shortly after using breath freshener containing alcohol the reading was 120 (no alcoholic drinks had been consumed) by the time the machine had reset and the second sample was provided it was 15. 8 minutes later the reading was zer,.
At the roadside, If the police have grounds to believe that a driver has consumed alcohol in the past 20 minutes - not an hour - then they should wait for the 20 minutes to be up. Unless they have specific information that alcohol has been consumed in the past 20 minutes then they do not have to wait.
Now it might seem sensible to ask when the driver last had an alcoholic drink but case law says that this is not actually necessary.
The reading that you are prosecuted for is the one at the police station and I am certain that mouth alcohol will have long gone by the time you are booked in to custody and then placed on the evidential machine.
I have done tests on the Lion Intoxilyzer 6000 for mouth alcohol. Very shortly after using breath freshener containing alcohol the reading was 120 (no alcoholic drinks had been consumed) by the time the machine had reset and the second sample was provided it was 15. 8 minutes later the reading was zer,.
Last edited by a moderator: