Good morning. Anxiety has kicked in again. As I will be pleading guilty, would l be asked to speak in court? Is the decision for sentencing done straight away or l will be asked to leave the room then called back in again.
They will hear your plea first. During this bit you’ll just have to confirm your details and then all you have to say after is guilty or not guilty.
If you plead guilty, then sentencing will most likely be later that day (or possibly on another day shortly after, depending on the volume of cases in court at that time). So you’ll then leave the room and wait for the sentencing part.
However it’s during this wait that you’ll most likely speak to the probation officer, who is if you like the ‘neutral’ element between your counsel (i.e. your lawyer should you instruct one, or hopefully the duty solicitor if you don’t, who will be just as qualified to represent you) and the magistrate, and whom you will get to explain all of the many mitigating factors you describe above to.
You want the probation officer onside. These guys have the power to sway the sentencing from light to heavy. Your interview with the PO is your chance to really explain your illnesses, decision making on the day etc., and why it was so out of character for you. You should also provide to them copies of any character references for the magistrate (do you have any of these, if not you really should get some sorted, they do help believe me) and explain any constructive measures you might have undertaken since being charged (i.e. stopped drinking, attended any programmes, reviewed medication etc.). The PO I saw was quite friendly actually, which helped. I was going through a rotten period around the time of my conviction and I was glad for the opportunity to explain what had led to me making such a bad decision.
Then when you’re called back in for sentencing, the incident will be discussed in more detail. It’s entirely up to you whether or not you wish to speak during this part. I chose to because I was asked a few questions by the magistrate directly. But you aren’t compelled to, and your counsel and/or the lawyer should be more than briefed (by you beforehand) to speak on your behalf.
If you plead not guilty, well I can’t speak with any experience on this because I didn’t. But I guess it’ll be adjourned and a future hearing will be scheduled in due course.
Note that a guilty plea will usually attract a 25% reduction in the length of your ban, on completion of the drink drive awareness course (well worth doing) at any time you choose to during your ban; as a concession in exchange for your cooperation in entering a guilty plea. But if you enter a not guilty plea, and it fails, you will not receive this offer or reduction. And if anything, I’d expect a less lenient sentence in this instance also. They don’t look fondly on people trying it on and wasting court time (not that I am saying you would be, of course).
It goes without saying that you should turn up early, well-presented and dressed smartly. And please do get those references.
So if you’ve decided a guilty plea is best, it honestly isn’t so bad; that is if you are honest with those representing you as well as the beak, and of course polite and contrite in court.
If not, it will drag on much much longer, and as said above I can’t speak with much authority on what happens next there. TBF it’s exactly why - right at the beginning of this thread - I suggested getting a trustworthy lawyer to discuss this with. We all have a fair idea of how this will all pan out, but none of us are experts (except of course Martin Hammond, who I’m guessing you didn’t contact?)