Dr40

[Lewhamiltom]

Basically iv been in charge of a vehicle blew 49, i have a drink driving conviction 9 and a half years ago, numerous factors which show i wouldnt be driving but all in all in still in charge of a vehicle.

Basically not made any argument against it as i was sat in the vehicle for a reaaonable period of time while intoxicated.

What can i expect?

The previous conviction was serious failing to stop also.

Is it pretty much a slam drunk a ban?

Thank you

 

[SeanJoyceStephensons]

It is a defence to an allegation of being in charge of a motor vehicle with excess alcohol if it can be established that there was no possibility that you would have driven that vehicle whilst over the legal limit. That is a matter of fact for the court to consider.

If you enter a guilty plea or are convicted after trial you will be penalised in accordance with the lowest possible sentencing bracket; facing a penalty of 10 points and a fine. The previous conviction within the last 10 years would only be relevant for sentencing purposes if you were being charged with a driving related alcohol offence on this occasion. Given that this is an allegation of being 'drunk in charge' it will not automatically lead to an increased penalty on this occasion.