Anothersillyfool
Member
Hi there.
I made what I now consider a very foolish decision to drive two hours after consuming two glasses of wine. Whilst I am ashamed and appalled at the consequences and situation I find myself in, remorseful also and will never ever again consider driving after drinking, I'm also a little bewildered as to my roadside reading, which was 61.
It was to my advantage that I take the test at the police station, as I just couldn't see how the reading could be so high after two hours, and two glasses of wine. However despite three attempts at the test, I did not produce a specimen and have subsequently been charged with Failing to supply a specimen for analysis. I was in state of shock, and very stressed, however I did exactly as the officer told me, in exactly the same way I had the roadside test. I have just been looking at what can cause a breathalyser to fail, and have read something of an invalid sample when the scale between readings is too great (it was very technical, do excuse me) and was wondering if the printout would state where the problem in the test lay? Could this possibly be the cause of my fail? or is an invalid sample something completely different? After returning to the Police Station some 6 hours later to pick up my car keys, I again managed to do the handheld breathalyser, with a zero result.
Also, after charging me, the officer told me that I might not neccessarily be prosecuted, so not to start worrying about disqualification just yet, but that I should get a lawyer. Is this normal? Having read up on the charge, and given that I don't think shock and stress are reasonable excuse, and therefore I am inherently guilty of the charge, the outcome is worse than that of drink driving, with a mandatory ban and the potential for a custodial sentence. Was he just trying to make me feel better? Because at that point, nothing would.
Ashamed still, and will never again drive after drinking.
Thanks for any help, and apolgies for the wordiness.
I made what I now consider a very foolish decision to drive two hours after consuming two glasses of wine. Whilst I am ashamed and appalled at the consequences and situation I find myself in, remorseful also and will never ever again consider driving after drinking, I'm also a little bewildered as to my roadside reading, which was 61.
It was to my advantage that I take the test at the police station, as I just couldn't see how the reading could be so high after two hours, and two glasses of wine. However despite three attempts at the test, I did not produce a specimen and have subsequently been charged with Failing to supply a specimen for analysis. I was in state of shock, and very stressed, however I did exactly as the officer told me, in exactly the same way I had the roadside test. I have just been looking at what can cause a breathalyser to fail, and have read something of an invalid sample when the scale between readings is too great (it was very technical, do excuse me) and was wondering if the printout would state where the problem in the test lay? Could this possibly be the cause of my fail? or is an invalid sample something completely different? After returning to the Police Station some 6 hours later to pick up my car keys, I again managed to do the handheld breathalyser, with a zero result.
Also, after charging me, the officer told me that I might not neccessarily be prosecuted, so not to start worrying about disqualification just yet, but that I should get a lawyer. Is this normal? Having read up on the charge, and given that I don't think shock and stress are reasonable excuse, and therefore I am inherently guilty of the charge, the outcome is worse than that of drink driving, with a mandatory ban and the potential for a custodial sentence. Was he just trying to make me feel better? Because at that point, nothing would.
Ashamed still, and will never again drive after drinking.
Thanks for any help, and apolgies for the wordiness.