Not provided with a specimen of blood

Convicted Driver Insurance

lancasterSteve

New Member
Hello,

On 2/6/17 I was driving home, possibly slightly over the limit, but doubt by very much. I'd drunk about 5 bottles of lager over about 4 hours. On my way home, I hit a parked vehicle. The damage was minor, and the collision was caused by my contact lens falling out, rather than me being impaired. As it was 12:30am, and there was no one around (or so I thought), I stupidly drove home, in the hope that no one had seen me. The damage to other vehicle wasn't more than a scratch.

When I got home, I was a little shaken, and to calm myself, drunk a couple more bottles of lager, and a couple of shots. 45 minutes later, a police officer turned up at my door, and asked who had been driving the car. I admitted to this (without even thinking about the drink driving possibility). His next words were "I'm arresting you ...". I explained that drink-driving was ridiculous, and that I was clearly drinking at home (he took the spirit bottle as evidence).

At the police station, there was a failure with the breathalyser, and they arranged for a blood sample to be taken. The doctor finally arrived around 4am (almost 4 hours after I was driving) and took the sample. Two samples were taken and I was asked to choose one, and was told I would be given it when I was released. I was also told what to do with it to get it analysed etc.

Eight hours later I was interviewed, where I admitted to the collision, but denied the excess alcohol. I was then given my property, asked for a phone number, and was told they would text me when the blood results were back.

I can not afford to employer a solicitor, or appoint an expert witness for back calculations etc. So, whatever happens with this, I am dealing with myself.

I have two questions in relation to this. The first is, how long should it take for me to hear about the outcome, as I was told by the police that it takes between 4-6 weeks. It is now 7 and a half, yet I have heard nothing. The second is, I was not given my copy of the blood specimen when I was released, is this a viable defence?

At this time, as I haven't heard anything, I don't even know what the blood results will be. However, I'm trying to plan for the worst. Through my own research (as I don't seem to be able to find much information on this), I have found that according to the Road Traffic Offenders Act Section 15.5, if they didn't give me my copy of the sample, then their sample is inadmissible as evidence (and therefore any other evidence based upon it). Obviously, I'm paraphrasing what is written in the legislation, but the meaning, as far as my understanding goes, is the same.

Am I right in assuming that if I use this as my defence, then the onus falls upon the prosecution to prove that I was given it? As they won't be able to do this, as I didn't receive it.

After nearly two months, the worry is really starting to get to me, especially with the not knowing. However, as I said, I'm trying to prepare for the worst, and would like an opinion on this from someone who actually understands the subject a lot more thoroughly than I do.


Thank you for any advice, in advance.


Regards


Steve Bryce
 
The usual timescale given by the police is around 6 weeks before a result will be conveyed to you and you will receive a charge. It is not unusual for it to take longer and the length of time before any charge is laid will not prejudice the prosecution case as long as proceedings are issued within 6 months of the date of the offence. The delay in time is unlikely to be a delay in waiting for the specimen to be analysed and most likely to be a backlog with the independent analyst writing up and reporting the results. The specimen would usually be analysed very quickly after it is taken.

Raising a defence of post incident consumption is only the first step. The burden falls on you as the defendant to establish that where it not for the 'post incident' consumption of alcohol you would not have been above the legal limit at the time your specimen was obtained. This will be very difficult to present with any weight without a forensic toxicologist report.

You should be offered a specimen of blood to take away and have independently analysed. It appears here that you were offered and you accepted. The Crown can argue, with the support of case law, that you could have returned to the station to collect the specimen after leaving without it. This issue would fall on the facts of the case and the sequence of events together with any conversations about the independent specimen at the time you were bailed and released. It is not as black and white as arguing that because you left without it after accepting it several hours earlier then the Crown have breached in their procedural obligations and the evidential specimen is therefore excluded. A thorough examination of what exactly happened after that will be necessary by the court.

Given that this is your second conviction within 10 years you will face a minimum 3 year disqualification if convicted.
 
Enter code DRINKDRIVING10 during checkout for 10% off
Top