Barnabie
New Member
I have a question regarding a technical issue. I had a sample of blood taken by a police doctor whilst I was in hospital. The sample was taken from a cannula, which had been inserted by a paramedic some five hours earlier. The cannula had been used for administration of intravenous morphine before the blood sample was taken.
I was unable to give my consent for blood to be taken at the time, however, both my father and partner were present at the hospital, but they weren't asked for consent to take a sample. They were forced to wait for several hours for the police doctor to arrive and take a sample before being allowed to see me, even though my life was in the balance, and I could very easily have died.
The doctor has stated that he had to use the cannula, as there was no other viable way of drawing blood, as I was in such a critical condition.
The prosecution have a well known expert who says that the method of obtaining the blood sample should not matter, and that BMI guidelines are just guidelines, and any infringement wouldn't affect the result of the test.
My blood reading was 89mg
Would there be any point in contesting this?
I was unable to give my consent for blood to be taken at the time, however, both my father and partner were present at the hospital, but they weren't asked for consent to take a sample. They were forced to wait for several hours for the police doctor to arrive and take a sample before being allowed to see me, even though my life was in the balance, and I could very easily have died.
The doctor has stated that he had to use the cannula, as there was no other viable way of drawing blood, as I was in such a critical condition.
The prosecution have a well known expert who says that the method of obtaining the blood sample should not matter, and that BMI guidelines are just guidelines, and any infringement wouldn't affect the result of the test.
My blood reading was 89mg
Would there be any point in contesting this?